00:00:10,370	Okay. We will call to order this. This month’s meeting of the Burleigh County Planning and Zoning Commission. We will start with the Pledge of Allegiance. So please rise and remove any head coverings. I pledge allegiance. To the flag. For the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands.

00:00:31,200	One nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Amen. All right. We’ll move into roll call. So, Marla, if you could take us through a roll. Okay. Commissioner Bitner. Commissioner Connelly here. Commissioner Hull here. Commissioner Jarratt here. Commissioner Munson here. Commissioner Patrick here. Commissioner Small. Commissioner Streifel here. We have a quorum.

00:01:03,730	Thank you. All right. We’ll. We do not have any minutes to approve this meeting, so we will, uh, pass over that on the agenda and we’ll move it to the public. Comments section. This is not this is not a public hearing. The public hearings will come up later.

00:01:21,500	Uh, this is an area for Burleigh County residents and landowners to give us any general public comment, if necessary or wanted, if there’s any public comments, please bring them forward. Uh, now. Okay. Seeing no public comment, we will move into the consent agenda. Looks like we have four items on the consent agenda.

00:01:47,670	And, uh, unless anyone wants to open any of these up individually. Um, I would entertain a motion to, uh, accept the consent agenda and move those to public hearings. Motion to do that. Second. Okay. It has been moved and seconded to approve the consent agenda as presented. Any discussion on that? Hearing none. All in favor, say aye. Aye aye.

00:02:11,530	Any opposition? None. Okay. The consent agenda is approved. We’ll move into our public hearings for the evening. Uh, we have a few on the docket. Looks like we are going to start with the Arcadia Light Estates subdivision. And, uh, looks like Jacob’s going to take us through some details on this before we open the public hearing.

00:02:40,400	Commission. This is regarding the Arcadia Estates subdivision, located in part of the southeast, one fourth of section 15 of Burnt Creek Township. This is located on an 80.1 acre parcel of land, and the proposal would be the creation of a five lot subdivision, with each lot containing 16.5 acres.

00:03:04,400	The zoning on this site would remain agricultural, and all of the all of the proposed lots would be accessible from the existing 26th Street Northeast, so no new roads would be created. I can now answer any questions on this project. All right. Any questions for Jacob before he steps away? Seeing none. Thank you. Jacob.

00:03:26,900	Okay. We will now open the public hearing for the Arcadia Lights Estates subdivision. So if you would like to speak in this public hearing, please approach the lectern and tell us who you are, where you’re from, and sign in. And I believe, is there a sign in there is up there. Thank you. Jeff. Note I.

00:03:45,000	Thank you. Thank you, chair. Miller was Hagen Engineering representing the applicant on this one. Um, you’ve seen a little bit of this before. It was here a couple of months ago with slightly larger lots. They were around 18 acres at that point.

00:04:01,000	Um, in the meantime, the developer and the owners have come to an agreement that they maybe want to think about some things for a future phase so that change the size of these lots a little bit. So now they are down to 16.5 acres each. Um, still obviously quite large lots. Uh, zoning will remain an agricultural though.

00:04:15,530	Um, other than that, really nothing different from from the last time we were here. But I can answer any questions if you have them. Okay. Any questions for Landon? Thank you much. Thank you.

00:04:32,770	If anyone else would like to speak in this public hearing on Arcadia Light’s estate subdivision, please approach the lectern and tell us who you are, where you’re from, and sign in. Anyone else like to speak on this public hearing? And last call for the Arcadia Lights Estates subdivision? Public hearing. Seeing no further comments. Any reason we need to continue this? We will close the public hearing and move into action and discussion on, uh, on the Arcadia Lights Estates subdivision.

00:05:00,800	Mr. chair, I would move to approve the final plat and give a do pass recommendation to Burleigh County Commission second. All right. It’s been moved, uh, to accept this, and I do pass recommendation to the Burleigh County Cork County Commission by Commissioner Munson, seconded by Commissioner Connelly. Is there any discussion on the motion? Okay.

00:05:25,900	Seeing none, we’ll move into a roll call vote. So, Marla, if you could take us through a roll call, vote on this. Okay. The motion is to approve the subdivision and move it to the county commission with the do pass recommendation. Commissioner Streifel. Yes, Commissioner Patrick. Yes, Commissioner Munson. Yes. Commissioner Bitner. Yes, Commissioner Connelly. Yes.

00:05:51,030	Commissioner Hull. Yes. Commissioner Jarratt. Yes. And chairman. Yes. All approved. All right. The Arcadia lights, estates, Arcadia Lights Estates subdivision will move to the Burleigh County Commission with a do pass recommendation. We’ll move it to our second public hearing of the evening. Uh, the olive tree, second subdivision.

00:06:14,000	And it looks like Jacob’s going to take us through some details before we open this public hearing. Yeah. Hello again. Commission, this is regarding the Olive tree second subdivision, located at 5501 Dietrich Place. This features parts of land on two separate lots, one being a 1.43 acre parcel and the other being a 33.19 acre parcel.

00:06:42,430	The parcels in question are both owned by Derek Horner, and there is an existing principal structure on the smaller of the two lots. There is a proposed accessory building on the larger of the two lots, and as many of you may know, we do not currently allow for accessory buildings on lots that do not

00:07:01,630	currently have principal structures to which this larger lot currently does not. To allow for the creation of this accessory unit, the the smaller lot and some acreage of the larger lot would be combined in this proposal to create a new lot of 25 acres, which would therefore allow the accessory

00:07:22,830	building to be created. I can now answer any questions. All right. Any questions for Jacob? Thank you. We will now open the public hearing on the olive tree second subdivision. So if anyone would like to speak in this public hearing, please approach your lectern, tell us who you are, where you’re from, and sign in.

00:07:41,000	Thank you again. Chair. And I’m representing the applicants on this one as well. Um, yeah. Just as Jacob mentioned, this is just basically a large scale lot combination. Uh, the owner owns considerable property in the in the area and wants to build an accessory building, quite large one.

00:07:58,800	So he is planning this other section of land. Um, there is still some remaining land that was platted on the west side, but we have left access to that. There is ample space if you have if Mr.

00:08:11,170	Waters were ever to extend to the north, or if Olive tree were to extend from the south, there is room for right of way and for lots to be on other side of that future right of way. But for now, just, uh, just the expanding of the of the single lot.. All right. Answer any. questions if you have any questions for Landon. Seeing none. Thank you. Thank you.

00:08:27,070	If anyone else would like to speak in this public hearing on Olive trees second subdivision, please approach. Anyone like to speak in this public hearing. I’ll give it a last call for the Olive tree. Second subdivision. Seeing none, we will close this public hearing and move into discussion and action. Mr. chair, I approve the final plat. Give a two pass recommendation to the Berlin County Commission. Second.

00:08:58,330	All right. Has been moved by Commissioner Streifel for a do pass recommendation to the Burleigh County. Burleigh County Commission and seconded by Commissioner Hull. Is there any discussion on the motion? Seeing none, we’ll move into a roll call. Vote tomorrow. If you could take us through that.

00:09:17,030	Okay. The motion is to approve the subdivision and give a due pass recommendation. Um, Commissioner Bitner. Yes, Commissioner Streifel. Yes, Commissioner Patrick. Yes. Commissioner Connelly. Yes, Commissioner Hull. Yes, Commissioner Munson. Yes, Commissioner Jarratt. Yes. And chairman. Yes. All approved. Okay. Olive tree, second subdivision will go to the Burleigh County Commission with a do pass recommendation.

00:09:51,230	Our third public hearing of the evening is the Apple Creek Ridge third subdivision. And, Jacob, if you’d like to take us through some details on that and then we can get into the public hearing. Hello again. Commission. This is regarding a property at 11737 Apple View Lane near manakin.

00:10:18,670	These are two lots within the existing Apple Creek Ridge Subdivision, which one of which has a principal use on it and the other is currently unoccupied. The owner is the same for both, and they wish to build an accessory unit on the unoccupied parcel. And once more we do not allow that under code currently.

00:10:39,770	So this proposal would be to merge the two lots into one new lot to allow for the existence of this accessory unit. The current lots are 1.55 acres each, and the new combined lot would be just over three acres and the zoning would not change. I can now answer any questions.

00:10:55,800	All right. Any questions for Jacob seeing none. Thank you. All right. We will open the public hearing on Apple Creek Ridge third subdivision. If anyone would like to speak, please approach. And anyone like to speak in this public hearing, I’ll give it a last call.

00:11:17,700	If anyone would like to speak in the Apple Creek Ridge Third Subdivision public hearing. Seeing none, we’ll close the public hearing, move in to discussion and action. Mr. chairman, yes, we approve the Apple Creek Ridge subdivision and forward to the county commission second. Okay.

00:11:43,470	It has been moved for moved for approval or a do pass recommendation to the, uh, the Burleigh County Commission by Commissioner Patrick and seconded by Commissioner Hull. Is there any discussion? Any discussion on the motion? Seeing none, we’ll move into a roll call vote. So, Marla, if you could take us through that. Okay. The motion is to approve the subdivision and give a due pass recommendation. Commissioner Connelly.

00:12:07,870	Yes, Commissioner Hull. Yes, Commissioner Jarratt. Yes, Commissioner Bitner. Yes. Commissioner Munson. Yes. Commissioner Streifel. Yes, Commissioner Patrick. Yes. And. Chairman. Yes. All approved. Okay. The Apple Creek Ridge third subdivision will move to the Burleigh County Commission, where they do pass recommendation. And our our next public hearing of the evening. Look at these straight. Is the misty waters.

00:12:38,930	Third, replant and Jacob’s going to take us through some details on that. And then we’ll open the public hearing. Hello again. Commission. This is regarding a property at 6301 Dream Circle in the existing Misty waters subdivision.

00:13:01,970	This is regarding two neighboring plots of land that are both currently unbuilt, and the property owner is seeking to combine the two lots to create one new, larger lot that would then allow them to build their house on the new, larger lot, which would allow them to build over the existing property line. This new property would be 1.45 acres in size, and the zoning would not change. I can now answer any questions.

00:13:21,070	All right. Any questions for Jacob seeing none. Thank you. We’ll open the public hearing on Misty waters. Third replay. So if anyone would like to speak in this public hearing, please approach the lectern. Let us know who you are, where you’re from and sign in. Right. Good evening.

00:13:43,500	Commission. I’m my name. My name is Jesse Shugart. I’m the property owner. Um, everything that was presented just doesn’t work. Try again. There we go. Everything that was presented is correct. I just wanted to come up here and answer any questions. If there were any for me. Okay. Anyone have any questions for Jesse? All right.

00:14:06,100	Seeing none. Thanks, Commissioner Thank you. If anyone else would like to speak in this public hearing, please approach the lectern. And last call for the misty waters. Third, replant public hearing. Seeing none, we will close the public hearing on Misty waters. Third, replant. Move to approve with a two pass recommendation to Burleigh County Commission. Second.

00:14:29,870	Okay. It has been moved for a due pass recommendation to the Burleigh County Commission by Commissioner Munson, seconded by Commissioner Connelly. Uh, and is there any discussion on the motion? Seeing none, we’ll move into a roll call vote. So, Marla, if you could take us through that. Okay.

00:14:55,200	The motion is to give a do pass recommendation and approve the report. Um, Commissioner Bitner. Yes, Commissioner Connelly. Yes, Commissioner Streifel. Yes, Commissioner Patrick. Yes, Commissioner Hull. Yes. Commissioner Jarratt. Yes. Commissioner Munson. Yes. And. Chairman. Yes. All approved. Okay. The Misty waters third report will go to the Burleigh County Commission with the do pass recommendation.

00:15:22,270	And we will move into our final public hearing of the evening. This is the revisions to certain revisions to the ordinances or to certain ordinances.

00:15:46,270	Uh, we have a lot of, uh, ordinances that we have some, uh, edits to, uh, is there any thing you’d like to say before we open this? Mitch? Um, commissioners. Mr. chair, um. Oh, we’ve been working for a long time on these, and so we’re at the kind of at the homestretch. Um, I have not had any comments from in public on this or any questions.

00:16:24,170	Um, in my mind, the, um, these changes are allowing increased use and, uh, less restrictions, but more allowable uses than were there before. Uh, such as home occupancy, major home occupancies all the way down to, uh, cell towers to shop condos that weren’t there before. And so we’re just allowing there we are creating more allowances in our ordinances. So I didn’t have any um, nobody contacted me or questions on any of it, but, uh.

00:16:51,500	Okay. And, Mitch, just so, uh, I guess just to remind everyone or anyone listening that, uh, the reason that we are modifying these ordinances or that we have these revisions to these ordinances, is directly because of the ETA change of the of the a lot of the ETA going to the county, uh, the county ordinances.

00:17:15,400	Yeah. I mean, it’s been on my mind to include these long time ago. I mean, for a simple thing as a cell tower. Luckily, we haven’t had any permits, applications for them, but they’re a big deal if they want to put them next to a subdivision. Sure.

00:17:30,930	So, okay, now it requires a special use or will if we if we get these approved. Any questions for Mitch before he steps away? Commissioner Bitner. Yes. There’s had a question. You know, I just had a question. We we’re. Talking about allowing, um, storage units in rural residential. Okay. The next box. No. Um.

00:17:53,870	You mean private storage? Yeah. Yes. Yeah. Any reason why we wouldn’t add that in, uh, ag zoning also? I know, no, it’s typically you see them next to residential areas for storage units from their houses. It’s close by. It’s adjacent. Well, it makes sense.

00:18:18,530	If you had ag land right next to a housing development, then you wouldn’t be on. I’m thinking it’s not real practical to take a like. I bought some lots in the subdivision here recently, you know, and and like a $100,000 lot, I don’t think I’d want to put storage units on that.

00:18:37,570	If, you know, you could buy something maybe on the outside edge of that or something. Seems like a better, more practical thing. Yeah, that’d be a good. It sounds like a good idea. I mean, it’s, um. Yeah, because we have many ten acre lots that are zoned eg. Yeah. Yeah. So. Okay. Uh, any any additional questions? Commissioner Hull.

00:18:55,330	Yes. Uh, the question on uh, six, five eight and 659. Uh, regarding, uh, border yards, you know, if industrial wants to be, say, next to AG, I know AG can include a lot of stuff, but I, you know, um, it immediately pictured, you know, if a factory wanted to be next to, um, you know, a plow field

00:19:14,070	where the farmer only goes out three times a year, it’s like, I wasn’t sure if the I guess, you know, I guess I wasn’t sure on why they’d need to have a, you know, put up, you know, visual border or visual barrier. Sure. Yeah. Mr. Bitner. Yeah, I’d be happy. I’d be happy.

00:19:29,930	Happy to address that for you. Um, throughout, you know, historically, um, whether it was a city or the county, um, we always have those, those border, um, basically a screen between a more intense use and a less intense use. So that the, the more intense use doesn’t have a negative impact on the less intense. Yeah.

00:19:56,070	Yeah, I yeah, I totally understand. I just wasn’t sure if it, you know, if, if there’s a way to draw a line when it’s just next to plow field versus, you know. Yeah, I totally agree. Especially if it’s next to a residence or anything like that. Even if it’s AG used as residents.

00:20:10,500	I just wasn’t sure, you know, to let, let a factor or anything more intense use more of their land if it’s just next to a plow field, because I don’t think the I don’t think the wheat will care if there’s a factor, you know, ten feet close or without a bush between. Right. Well.

00:20:21,800	Yeah, I think I think it sometimes does come down to on AG. You can have residential or maybe future residents. That and I defer to protecting that case. But I wasn’t sure if we, you know, if there’s a way to. Mr.. Yes. Yeah. Mr.. Bitner.

00:20:34,170	Yep. So when I bought my place with 39 or 40 years ago, it was all fields around me. And, um, had that been industrial or commercial proposal, I would have expected there to be a buffer zone in between that and me. But now it’s, um, residential. And that happens all the time.

00:20:57,670	So a plowed field was what was the plowed field? Just, uh, four years ago is now housing development, right. It’s fully filled in. So you don’t want to. I don’t think you want to look at something as being. Well, it’s plowed field today and it’ll be a plowed field forever, right? Especially not in this area because stuff is happening really fast.

00:21:15,600	Thanks. Any additional questions for Mitch before he steps away? Yeah. Commissioner Streifel. , is this written as it will be in the ordinances. Without the without the changes? It’s not going to be highlighted either. So if we were to just for example, there’s a portion of it that’s doubled up on page five, we.

00:21:40,300	Have let us all get. There. Sure. Um. Which section? We have. Section two. Section two on page five. It’s in there twice. And one of it one time. We have a highlight in there. And on the second one we don’t. We can certainly point those out be when we’re on our. Public hearing.

00:22:03,770	That’s out. We took that out during our discussions. Yeah. But I. Mean well there’s no point to having it twice. No. So we need to get rid of one of those. And then I was just kind of wondering what a licensed drug less physician is while we’re there. Oh. We’re page five. Yeah.

00:22:26,570	Which number? Page five. It would be number one. The unredacted number one. And E. Line E underneath that. Right at the end of that sentence it says or licensed drug less physician. Oh. Mhm. I think those are homeopathic. Okay. Okay. Um and then on page 14. uh I think we also addressed this prior to tonight. Um.

00:22:55,470	Did I miss it. No, I’m, I’m not thinking you did. What page you on. Page 14. Right. Okay. With 14 and 18 are the same. We could remove one of those and then it would just be a number numbered up to 18. Yeah.

00:23:18,670	So on page 14, the uses usage number 14 and usage number 18 are are identical. So we could just take out 18. Again I thought we did that. Yeah we just. Did that. We could just knock that. One okay. We should make a list here. Now. Yeah we should add a zoning to that one. Take out section two. Um, occupation one. Double the double down. Section two.

00:23:38,470	Yep. And then remove line 14. Start all. Over and renumber beginning 18. Right. You missed. A lot. And, Marla, are you did you catch all that. So far? Um, I’m making. Zoning. Move forward with storage containers. No no no no no no, that’s already there. Personal storage. Personal storage. Yeah. Yep. Yeah. Okay okay.

00:24:08,070	And also on page 14. Yep. Um, when did number 15 commercial Greenhouse get in under ag district regulations, article 11 a that like that just totally popped in there. No, it’s been in there. It changes. It’s been underneath there since I started this.

00:24:33,700	So when you when you have a commercial greenhouse in a does that, is that something that’s going to pertain to Baldwin Greenhouse for example. No. So what’s what is the difference there. If you could help me. Commit a Baldwin greenhouse is considered a retail greenhouse where they they do not they may grow them, but they also bring in other plants, package them and resell them.

00:24:54,570	A commercial greenhouse on a farm grows these products. Period. They don’t bring them in to sell to the public. There’s no retail. It’s different sale. It’s the difference between retail and wholesale. Okay. So should it should so should it be listed as a commercial activity under a.

00:25:15,900	Uh, that’s I mean, I looked it up under most definitions of commercial greenhouse is considered a, uh, productive, uh, farming productive produce kind of deal that they do not sell to the public. There’s no retail. Okay. All right. Thank you. I think that was it. I appreciate you catching that and being thorough here, Commissioner Uh, any other questions for Mitch before he steps away? Okay. Seeing none. Thank you.

00:25:47,100	Mitch, we will open the public hearing on the revisions to, uh, all of these ordinances. Uh, we have, uh, ordinances all the way from the definitions all the way through industrial and anywhere in between.

00:26:07,770	If anyone would like to speak on these, uh, changes to these ordinances, please approach the lectern, let us know who you are, where are you from? And sign in. I thought, sure, that’s what the whole crowd was here for. But I was wrong. All two of them. Everybody. But to. Remember, we must have bored everybody, I guess. I don’t know. They got their sleep aid. Yeah. If any. Uh, yes, Commissioner Streifel. Yes.

00:26:30,600	I was wondering why we couldn’t have had these posted online. Because I had several requests for these, and I know they had to go into the office and get them, but it would be nice just to have a link to this online, where for the next public hearing, where anybody who wants to come and speak on them

00:26:47,870	can actually just go online and look at what we’re doing. I think the agenda is available online, isn’t it? This wasn’t. All that wasn’t part. Of it. It’s not okay. Okay. Yeah. I send the agenda to Mary when I send it out to everybody. Mary Singer, she posts things on the website. Yeah.

00:27:09,330	But I have heard from a couple people that this was not on there. That wasn’t part of it. Okay. But I did send her an email today again. So no, the the way I understand. It, we because that’s it makes sense.

00:27:27,100	You know, we want to be as transparent and as informative as we can to the public. So we’ll we’ll follow up on that. Now I believe, Mitch, correct me if I’m wrong, is that we we have a public hearing tonight and then we have to have a public hearing at the next meeting. Also, correct? Yeah. The intent is to review these and recommend the second public hearing. Okay.

00:27:43,270	And then and final final approval would go to the county commission. After the second hearing here. Yeah. There’s no public hearing from there. It gets posted for 30 days uh, online and in the paper. Okay. Thanks.

00:28:01,830	So I just wanted to clarify that, uh, so that we do have a chance to get it out for the before the next public hearing. Yeah. Or posted online. Excuse me if anyone. Oh, yeah. Go ahead. I did see. Mr. Chairman. Yes. Um, when we publish these in the newspaper, it’s just a single column.

00:28:29,230	Should I be doing a larger public hearing notice for these ordinances? Would you prefer that instead of. Because we don’t mail them out to anybody? I think I think what we do is just fine. It would just be.

00:28:43,500	I think the the question was, is that, um, you know, we put the agenda out there, but these but these, this, these ordinances with the changes weren’t actually part of that. So we’ll just have to make sure that that is that they’re available online. Yeah. I can. Put them together like they’re going to be submitted to the county commissioners and then have Mary post them. Okay. Okay. All right.

00:29:02,800	If anyone else would like to speak in this public hearing, please approach the lectern. Let us know who you are, where are you from and sign in. And last call for this public hearing. If anyone would like to speak. Seeing none, we will close this public public hearing and move into discussion and action.

00:29:26,000	So I would, uh, just, uh, could we entertain a motion to send this to a second public hearing at our next meeting? So moved. Second. Okay. It has been, moved by Commissioner Patrick and seconded by Commissioner Munson. Uh, to to close it or excuse me, to bring these revisions to the certain ordinances to a public hearing at our next meeting.

00:29:50,300	Is there any discussion on the motion? Mr.. Yeah. Commissioner, could. Marla read back what was pointed out tonight? So we make the three. She’s got it. All those three modifications or three, uh, changes. Okay, I have I’ll just go through this page by page. Um, remove the remove these section two home occupation that’s on there twice. Um, add.

00:30:23,870	And that is in and that was under agreeable or incidental. Five. So page. Five. Five. Just page five. Yep. Oh I guess the one question on that. Yes. Because it’s in twice. But there’s the difference of but not limited to which one are we removing. Right, right.

00:30:43,230	We want to we want to remove the second section two and leave the one with the with the highlighted but not limited to. Yeah. Yeah, I’ve got it that way. On my note. Okay. And then um, the other was to add, uh, storage units to eg zoning and.

00:31:11,430	That’s it. The other thing I would like to add is maybe we could add a greenhouse commercial description in our definitions under article three. Because if we put in retail greenhouse and greenhouse commercial. um that might help with some of the. I think that’s a great suggestion.

00:31:44,200	Is that get it get it clarified because when you read it, it doesn’t it’s not, uh, you know, I guess it was kind of news to us that that or news to a lot of us that Mister chair that there was, uh, wholesale. Mister chair. It’s already in there. It is. Yeah. Page. Page uh, three under definitions. Oh, okay.

00:32:03,770	Oh, and then Marla there was that, uh, the use is on page 14 that needed to be addressed. Also as part of this motion. Taking out the, um, temporary sale of certain items that is on there twice. That is correct. Yep. And then storage units in zoning. Yes. So yep. And those are all the changes.

00:32:31,000	Okay. Any other discussion on the motion? Yes. Yes. Commissioner Bitner. Yep. Okay. I own lots in a rural subdivision. And you know, I’m building a house on one of them right now and may build additional houses. And this change could have an effect on me. One positive or negative.

00:32:50,300	So like a potential conflict of interest, it would be up to the board to decide whether it’s a conflict of interest. And I should or should not vote on that thing. I don’t know what to say. I’m, you know, I am building houses and it could maybe have something to do with me. I don’t know.

00:33:08,870	Well, if I, I guess if anyone on the board, uh, you know, would, would, uh, have any issue with that? I think we could take that up after the, uh, after the second, uh, at the, at the next public hearing, uh, and or would it be tonight? No. Would it. Be now? Okay. Yeah. Is there.

00:33:27,000	I don’t have any plans. I don’t have anything going on. But I would I would move that. We allow Commissioner Bitner to. Vote on this change in. Our ordinance. I would say. Okay.

00:33:45,900	It has been moved to allow Commissioner Bitner to, uh, vote on these changes to the ordinances seconded by Commissioner Patrick. Uh, any discussion on the motion? All in favor of Commissioner Bitner voting on these changes to the ordinances, say aye. Aye. Any opposition hearing? None. I guess you got a vote. Thanks for the trust. Appreciate it. Okay. Yes, yes. Further discussion. Yes. Commissioner Streifel, I would like to bring up.

00:34:07,430	I would just like to question on page 35, number 19. Um, there’s some things going on in Texas right now where. Which article? 3035. I’m sorry, page 35. Number 19. Article. What. Are section three uses permitted? The new section three I go yep. Page. Page 35. Yep.

00:34:34,330	So I don’t know if you know how much I even want to say on this, but number 19, I’m not sure if we should add some sort of description or some sort of. Oh. We have planning and zoning in Texas that’s really dealing with some problems in that area right now.

00:34:53,770	And I just thought maybe we could kind of get ahead of it. But I kind of wanted to put it out there for see what the other commissioners think. And what are what are the issues. I think we probably understand. Right.

00:35:13,430	Um, and now that you’ve brought it up, maybe we should be thinking about that before the next meeting instead of putting something together. Just tonight. Let’s. Because I know what you’re talking about. Okay? And, um, it is certainly a touchy subject, and we definitely want to get that right. If we’re going to address that. Yes. Yeah. Mr.. I appreciate it. I think it deserves some thoughtful consideration. Yeah, yeah. Mitch. What’s up? Mr..

00:35:36,270	Mr.. Chair, Commissioner Bitner, do you want me to define religious institution or what you want to do? What do you want me to. Do for the next? We need to we need to kind of weigh it or think about it ourselves. I don’t have a I don’t have direction on it yet. Okay.

00:35:53,870	All right. Any further discussion on the motion to move this to a second public hearing at our next meeting? Seeing none, we’ll move into a roll call. Vote on this. Marlow, if you could take us through. Okay. The motion is to approve the ordinances with the changes suggested and moved to a second public hearing. Okay, Commissioner Hull.

00:36:26,400	Yes. Commissioner Connelly. Yes, Commissioner Jarratt. Yes, Commissioner Munson. Yes, Commissioner Bitner. Yes, Commissioner Patrick. Yes. Commissioner Streifel. Yes. And chairman. Yes. All approved. Okay. The revisions to the ordinances will be at a go to a public hearing, uh, appearing on, uh, next month agenda. Uh, so we will, uh, get all our feedback then.

00:36:56,900	And after that hearing, uh, then it does move on to the, uh, county commission. And that is all we have on the agenda for tonight. Uh, we’ll move into other business, but I guess I should have said this in the in the beginning. Welcome, Commissioner Hull. Uh, happy to have you. Thanks for, uh, thanks for your feedback.

00:37:17,670	I did get the memo on wearing blue. Oh, fantastic. Fantastic. Yeah. We’re going to have to work on Commissioner Patrick over. Here. Uh, is there any other any additional business that we need to take up tonight? Okay. Is there a motion to adjourn? All right. It’s been motion.

00:37:40,700	It was moved and seconded to adjourn. All in favor, say aye. Aye. Any opposition hearing?