00:00:10,170	Good evening everyone. This is June 24th, 2026. Welcome to this meeting of the planning Bismarcks Planning and Zoning Commission. With that, I’m going to call the meeting to order. Sarah, would you please call roll? Commissioner Bitner. Commissioner Johnson. Here. Commissioner Schell. Here. Schmitz. Sivak here. Swanson here. Taylor here. Here. Here. Here. Here. Here. Here. Wangler and chair.

00:00:49,770	Schwartz here. Thank you. With that, we’ll move on to. The first item in our agenda is approval of meeting minutes from the May 27th meeting. Commissioners, what are your wishes? Move to approve. We have a motion to approve from Commissioner Swanson. Second. A second from Commissioner Johnson. Any discussion? And I’m not seeing.

00:01:11,930	You’re hearing any. Sir, would you please call the roll. Commissioner Johnson? Yes. Schell. Yes. Sivak. Yes. Taylor. Yes. Yes. Schwartz. Yes. Motion is approved. With that, we’ll move on to the public comment section of our meeting this evening.

00:01:36,800	And we are limited to items on the meeting’s consent agenda or the previous Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. And we have not on the consent agenda this evening. So it would be last, uh, last month’s meeting. I will open I will open up the public comment period. Is there anyone that would care to step forward and. Speak? Second call. Third and final call.

00:02:03,900	With that, I’m going to close the public comment period. With that, we’ll move on to the consent agenda. And there is no consent agenda this evening. So we will move on to our regular agenda. And the first item on our regular agenda is northern Sky, second edition lock two. And Lauren is going to provide us with staff report this evening.

00:02:26,330	Uh, good evening, Chairman Schwartz and commissioners. Wilmot development LLC is requesting approval of an annexation on all of block two northern Sky, second edition, first read plat. The project area is in northwest Bismarck, in the northwest corner of North Washington Street in Ash Coulee Drive on the north side of Wilkinson Place, and it contains 1400 or 146,111ft.

00:03:00,500	The property has been identified as community mixed use. In the Future Land Use plan, and adjacent uses include a mix of office, institutional and commercial properties. The current annexation request is only for block two.

00:03:20,830	The other lots within that subdivision will be annexed when the development of the properties occur by or by February 25th, 2030, per a development agreement between the city and the current property owner. Um annexations do not have a public hearing before this commission. Notification requirements will be met before it’s heard by the City Commission.

00:03:39,100	I notification to the township in Burleigh County, um, to my knowledge, staff have not received any formal comments regarding this request at this time. Uh, the request was evaluated according to standards containing the Comprehensive Plan Code of Ordinances and State Law. The annexation request does trigger the held in abeyance costs for regional stormwater improvements in the construction of North Washington Street. Those held in abeyance.

00:03:59,900	Costs associated with block two will be allocated to the parcels being annexed based on their proportionate area of the year. Following the annexation being completed. As a result of the findings contained in the staff report.

00:04:18,630	City of Bismarck staff find that the proposed annexation would not adversely impact the public health, safety and general welfare and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Code of Ordinances and State Law. As a result of those findings contained within that staff report, staff recommends approval of the annexation of all of block two northern Sky, second edition. First report. Do you have any questions. Commissioners? Questions for. Lauren. I’m not seeing or hearing anyone. Thank you. Thank you.

00:04:43,870	With that, commissioners, this is final consideration for this agenda item. So staff’s recommendation is to approve what are your wishes. Move to approve. We have a motion to approve from Commissioner Johnson. Second second from Commissioner Sivak commissioners. Any additional discussion? And I’m not seeing. You’re hearing any. Sir, would you please call. Roll? Commissioner Taylor. Yes, yes, Commissioner. Shell. Yes, Commissioner. Swanson. Yes, Commissioner. Sivak. Yes.

00:05:16,130	And Commissioner Johnson. Excuse me. Yes. Chair. Schwartz. Yes. The motion is approved. With that, we’ll move on to item B in our regular agenda, which is DCN first edition. And I believe Jenny is going to provide us with staff report this. Evening. Thank you. Chairman Schwartz.

00:05:38,170	Commissioners DCN, LLC request approval of a zoning map amendment and major subdivision final plat titled DC and additions. The request is located in north central Bismarck, north of East Calgary Avenue between North Washington Street and State Street, in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Coleman Street in 43rd Avenue Northeast, consists of 12.25 acres with one lot and one block.

00:05:57,000	The Land Development code and official map were recently approved. As such, the zoning ordinance for the proposed zoning map will reflect the new zoning district equivalents outlined in our LDC. The zoning map amendment would be from the Agricultural Zoning district and the residential zoning district to the OCS office. Mixed use.

00:06:17,070	This replaces the RT Residential District. The property has been identified as a neighborhood mixed use in our land use plan. The proposed zoning districts would conform to the character of this neighborhood. Mixed use district. Adjacent land uses include an existing single family dwelling and undeveloped land to the north across 43rd Avenue Northeast. Developing medical uses to the east across Coleman Street.

00:06:38,900	Multifamily residential to the south, and a medical use to the west. You consider this request at your meeting on April 22nd and called for a public hearing. A notice was published in the Tribune on June 11th and 18th, and 71. Postcards were mailed to the owners of nearby properties.

00:06:54,470	On June 12th, a sign providing information was also placed on the property on a publicly accessible spot. On June 8th. Staff did receive two inquiries regarding this request. Concerns were made regarding the condition of surrounding streets and the possibility of constructing a roundabout.

00:07:14,030	In conjunction with this plat, staff did know that this request is to facilitate the combination of the parcel to the west that is currently vacant. There used to be a single family home here years ago, with the existing property. There will not be a roundabout constructed in conjunction with this plot.

00:07:30,900	The proposed zoning map amendment and major subdivision final plat were evaluated according to standards contained within the Comprehensive Plan Bismarck Code of Ordinances and State Law, and as a result of all the findings contained in the staff report, staff find that the proposed plat would not adversely impact the public health, safety and general welfare and is consistent with our Comprehensive Plan Code of Ordinances and State Law.

00:07:46,700	Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Zoning Map amendment from the Agriculture and Residential Zoning districts to the Residential Zoning District, which will be our OCS office, mixed use district and approval of a major subdivision final plat for DC and addition. Do you have questions, commissioners? Questions for Jennie.

00:08:10,800	Jennie is there is there a plan to build something on this lot, or is it just being made part of the the whole up there at DCM.? Chairman Schwartz commissioners I do believe the applicant’s consultant is here and can speak further on this.

00:08:27,330	I don’t know if there’s an immediate plan, but there may be an opportunity to build another building to support their uses in the future. Okay. Thank you. Commissioners. Additional questions. I’m not seeing. Thank you Jenny. Thank you. With that. This is a public hearing for this agenda item.

00:08:47,030	Uh, so I will open up the public hearing at this time is either the requester or representative available to speak to it. Sir, if you would add your name to the log up there and introduce yourself, it would be wonderful. Certainly. Uh, chair Schwartz commissioners, I’m. Brad Craig. I work for Clay engineering. I’m the consultant hired by DCN to facilitate this plat and zone change. And I’ll stand for any questions you may have.

00:09:17,970	Commissioners questions I’ll pose Flanagan is, uh, is there a plan to build on this, or is it just going to be part of the the whole DCM property there? Yeah. Chair Schwartz commissioners. Uh, there’s definitely a plan to build someday. There’s no immediate plans right now. At least none that I’ve seen or know of.

00:09:41,430	Uh, as far as ideas, you know, they may do something to add on to their existing building. They may just have something as simple as an outdoor storage shed.

00:10:00,630	But they wanted to take care of the formalities of getting the zone change done now, and it platted, in case they do have that opportunity in the future to do something with that property. I understand. Thank you. Commissioners, additional questions. Brad, I’m not seeing or hearing any thank you. Thank you. With that, the podium is open for others that would care to address this agenda item. And I am not seeing or hearing anybody running towards the podium.

00:10:29,330	So with that, I’m going to close the public hearing on this agenda item. Jenny, any final comments? No thank you, Mr. Chairman. All right. Thank you. Commissioners, this, uh, is a request for a zoning map amendment and a major subdivision final plat. Both are recommended approval by staff. What are your wishes? Move to approve.

00:10:51,530	We have a motion to approve from Commissioner Swanson. Second and a second from Commissioner Sivak. Any additional discussion? Commissioners. And I’m not hearing or seeing any. Sarah, would you please call the roll. Commissioner Johnson? Yes. Swanson. Yes. Schell. Yes. Sivak. Yes. Taylor. Yes. Chair. Schwartz. Yes. The motion is approved.

00:11:16,500	With that, we’ll move on to item C and our regular agenda. Berg Acres edition. And once again, Jenny will provide us with staff report this evening. Chair Schwartz commissioners Stephanie Sheets and Dennis Berg are requesting approval of a zoning map amendment from the agriculture and Commercial zoning districts to the CG

00:11:38,900	Commercial Zoning District and major subdivision final plat titled Burke Acres Edition. The proposed plat and Zoning Map amendment are being requested to facilitate an event facility on lot two of the proposed plat.

00:11:54,500	There is an existing single family dwelling on lot one, which will remain and may be converted to a bridal suite in the future. This property is located within city limits east of East Bismarck, between 52nd Street and 66th Street, along the south side of East Main Avenue. It consists of 6.99 acres with two lots in one block.

00:12:12,600	Again, the Land Development code and map were recently approved. As such, the ordinance contains the new zoning equivalents. In this case, it would be a agriculture and CG commercial or commercial to the full CG commercial zoning district.

00:12:32,570	Last night, the City Commission approved an assumption agreement in water service contract amendment with the City of Lincoln to formally transfer the ownership of the water line in East Main Avenue and 66th Street to the city of Bismarck. The proposed subdivision and future event center can now be served by municipal or city water. The condition of approval outlined in the staff report pertaining to the water line is no longer necessary. The property does not have access to public sanitary sewer services.

00:12:52,770	City staff have determined that a private onsite septic system is acceptable for the event center and existing dwelling until city services or city sewer is available. Prior to the recording of the plat, the City Commission must approve a development agreement identifying future improvements to 62nd Street Southeast along the property’s western

00:13:11,770	boundary. And that right of park, part of that right of way is included in the plat, and an interim use of the private septic system until the public sanitary sewer becomes available. The applicants are aware of this development agreement and actually have signed the agreement. It has been submitted.

00:13:28,400	The agreement will be submitted to the City Commission along with the final plat. The property has been identified as neighborhood mixed use in our future land use plan. The proposed zoning district would conform to the character of this, um, use district. The project area is adjacent to undeveloped land to the north across East Main Avenue. A hotel and residential uses are to the east.

00:13:49,200	Undeveloped land is located to the south, and there are industrial uses to the west. You consider this request the Preliminary Plat and Zoning Map Amendment at your meeting on April 22nd, and called for a public hearing.

00:14:06,370	A notice was published in the Tribune on June 11th and 18th, and 22 postcards were mailed to the owners of nearby properties on June 12th. Also, we placed a sign on the property on June 8th. To my knowledge, we have not received any inquiries or written comments for this request. The proposed zoning map amendment and major subdivision final plat were evaluated according to the standards contained within the Comprehensive Plan.

00:14:24,370	Bismarck Court of Ordinances and State Law, and as a result of all the findings contained in the staff report, staff find that the proposed minor subdivision plot would not adversely impact the public health, safety, and general welfare and are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Code of Ordinances and State law.

00:14:41,230	Staff recommends approval of the Zoning Map amendment from the agricultural and Commercial Zoning districts to the CG Commercial Zoning District and Major subdivision. Final plat for Berg Acres Edition, with the following condition that the development agreement identifying future improvements to 62nd Street Southeast along the western boundary of the plat, and interim use of the

00:15:01,700	private septic system until a sanitary sewer, sewer, sanitary sewer service that’s three becomes available and is approved by the City Commission prior to recording the plot. Do you have questions, commissioners? Questions for Jenny. Thank you for that sign out there. I went out to look at the property.

00:15:24,230	Yeah, and I couldn’t figure out where I was at. And I think I drove by the sign a couple of times, and then all of a sudden I spotted it. That’s great. And so I knew what where I was. Awesome. Great. So thank you. Again, commissioners. Any questions? I’m not seeing or hearing any Jenny. Thank you.

00:15:40,800	With that. This is a public hearing for this agenda item. I will open the public hearing and ask that either the requester or representative step to the podium. Yes. Good evening. Uh, commissioners. Uh, my name is Tom Weigel. I’m with Moore Engineering. I’m here to represent the project.

00:16:19,370	Uh, Jenny did a wonderful job giving a summary to you about the project. Um, I don’t really have anything else to add about it other than stand for questions. Commissioners, do you have questions for Tom? Commissioner Johnson. could you describe the 62nd Street South would be improved? Is that right? As part of this or.

00:16:43,900	To the west of the property. Or that would be the access. Yes, that will be the access road. Um, and have that dedicated, uh, easement along there. It’s really intended for future development, I believe, south of this property. If that were to happen, that would be the access road.

00:17:10,430	And does that avoid the existing building in the shed that’s there? It seems very close to it. Yes it does. Okay. Yeah. All right. Thank you. Thank you, Commissioner Johnson. Commissioners. Additional questions. I’m not seeing you’re hearing any time. I think we’re we’re good to go. Thank you. Thank you. With that, the podium podium is open for others that would care to address this agenda item.

00:17:34,000	And I’m not saying you’re hearing any, but so with that I’m going to close the public hearing. Uh, commissioners, this is a request for a zoning map amendment and a major subdivision final plat. Uh, staff is recommending approval for both. Jenny, any finding final comments? No. Thank you. For asking. All right. Thank you.

00:17:54,200	So with that, commissioners, I ask, what are your wishes? I’ll make a motion to approve with conditions as stated. Uh, okay. Uh, just a moment. Jenny, does that existing condition remain or is it gone since it was signed off. On, uh.

00:18:20,570	Chair Schwartz commissioners, the um, condition outlined in your staff report is no longer necessary. So the one that I explained at the podium regarding the development agreement, um, would be the condition that we’re looking for. Would you explain that. One more time? Absolutely.

00:18:42,900	That the development development agreement identifying future improvements to 62nd Street Southeast along the western property boundary, and interim use of a private septic system until public sanitary sewer becomes available, is approved by the city Commission. Prior to recording of the plot. Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Sivak, would you care to modify your motion? Make a motion to approve. Okay. Motion to approve with the conditions outlined by Jenny. Okay. Thank you. Second, we have a second from Commissioner Johnson.

00:19:08,930	With that, Commissioner has any additional discussion. And I’m not seeing or hearing any. Sarah, would you please call. Roll? Yes. Commissioner Taylor. Yes. Yes. Commissioner Sivak. Yes. Johnson. Yes. Swanson. Yes. Schell. Yes. Chair. Schwartz. Yes. A motion is approved.

00:19:34,570	With that, we move on to item D in our regular agenda, which is part of Meadow Valley Edition and part of the replant of lot one, block two, Meadow Valley Edition. And I believe Isaac is going to give us staff report this evening. Yes, indeed.

00:19:51,630	Good afternoon or I guess good evening chair Schwartz and commissioners for this next regular agenda item, Colliers engineering are requesting approval of a special use permit for a drive through in conjunction with a financial institution on part of Meadow Valley Edition and part of the replant of Lot one, block two of Meadow Valley Edition.

00:20:07,330	As you can see on these screens before you, this is located in central Bismarck on the south side of East Bismarck Expressway between Bozeman and South seventh Street. This area might look familiar to you. This came before you as a replant request last month at your May 27th meeting. Uh, to and where you recommended approval of a subdivision that would turn this existing one parcel into a two lot in one block subdivision.

00:20:27,700	That’s just some background information for you all. As you may remember, that reply has not yet been approved by the City Commission or recorded, but when that is approved or recorded, this particular request would be for a special use permit for a bank on the eastern of the two lots.

00:20:47,330	Again, just as some background info, the applicant was aware of this as they were applying, so they correctly noted the existing legal description in their application. The property is located entirely within a CG commercial zoning district, which is not being requested to change at this time.

00:21:06,970	Adjacent land uses, including retail and services to the east, single family residential to the south, multifamily residential to the west, and the Kirkwood Mall to the north. The plat is identified as destination mixed use in the future land use plan.

00:21:24,770	As far as public engagement goes, the public was notified of this request via publications in the Bismarck Tribune on June 11th and 18th, and 45 postcards were mailed to owners of nearby properties on June 12th, 2026, and additionally a physical sign providing information to the public for the hearing was placed in a publicly accessible spot at the project location. On June 8th.

00:21:44,300	Uh staff did receive one inquiry on this request, asking some additional questions, but to my knowledge, staff have not received any formal written comments prior to this hearing. Uh, therefore, as a cumulative result of all the findings contained in the staff reports, City of Bismarck staff find that the proposed special use permit for a drive through in conjunction with a financial institution would not adversely impact public health, safety and general well-being,

00:22:05,630	and that it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Bismarck Code of Ordinances and relevant state law. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Special Use Permit for a drive through in conjunction with a financial institution on the previously described part of Meadow Valley Edition and part of the plot of lot one, block

00:22:23,830	two, Meadow Valley Edition. And before I ask if you have any questions for me, I will just note that I believe the applicant is online as well. If there are questions that I am not able to answer. And with that I ask if you have any questions. Very good. Isaac.

00:22:39,430	Uh, commissioners, do you have any questions for Isaac? I’m not seeing or hearing any. Thank you, thank you. With that, this is a public hearing. I will open the public hearing and ask that either a the requester or a representative, uh, speak to the agenda item. Good evening. My name is Jennifer Smith. I’m over here in the great state of Michigan.

00:23:02,770	So I wanted to thank you for allowing us to join virtually saved us a couple days trip out there. Um, but I don’t have much to add to what Isaac had to say. Um, we are requesting a it’s a drive up atm. It is not a teller. Um, and it is because it’s a special use permit.

00:23:21,230	We’re here tonight, so I’m here if you have any questions. Commissioners questions for Jennifer. Jennifer, I’m not seeing you’re hearing any. Thank you. Yeah. With that, the podium is open for others that would care to address this agenda item. And I am not seeing or hearing anybody stepping up to the podium.

00:23:48,100	So with that I am going to close the public hearing. Isaac, any additional comments? Not at this time. Chair. Thank you. All right. Thank you. Commissioners. This is a request for a special use permit. Staff recommendation is to approve. What are your wishes? Move to approve. We have a motion to approve from Commissioner Johnson. Second second from Commissioner Sivak.

00:24:14,800	Any additional discussion? Uh, Mister chair? Yes, Commissioner. Sorenson. Yeah. So this might be a question for Isaac. Um, I know, like, during the last month’s meeting, we, uh, split the parcel. Uh, I guess I’m just curious about that other piece. I know it’s kind of just an open parking lot.

00:24:32,500	Like, is this affected by that, or how will that need a special use permit? I guess I’m just curious about the next piece of the property. Uh, yes. So, uh, Commissioner Swanson, chair, Schwartz and commissioners, any other use on the property, particularly when the replant is finalized and recorded, uh, would be

00:24:51,370	unaffected by this particular special use permit. Um, if there was some other use that would require a special use permit, for example, they would need to apply for one as well. But these would be considered as separate entities, I guess. Does that answer your question, Commissioner Swanson? Thank you. Good morning. Curiosity.

00:25:08,730	Thank you, Commissioner Swanson. Thank you. Isaac, with that, additional questions, commissioners or discussion. I’m not seeing or hearing any with that. Again, it is a request for a special use permit. Staff’s recommendation is to approve. I think we’ve got a motion and a second on the table. Um, Sarah, would you please call a. Roll? Commissioner Swanson? Yes.

00:25:33,330	Schell. Yes. Sivak. Yes. Taylor. She is no longer present. Oh. We don’t have a quorum without her. Um, we’ll get the meeting started with a quorum. We’re okay. Okay, okay. Yeah. Sorry. Commissioner Johnson. Yes, Sivak. Yes, chair. Schwartz. Yes. A motion is approved.

00:26:02,170	With that, we move on to item number E in our regular agenda, which is planning and zoning Commission bylaws. And I believe Daniel is going to help us out on this. Good evening, Chair. and commissioners. This is. A continuation from last month.

00:26:20,370	And as you may recall, uh, we introduced some, some bylaws that chair Schwartz and staff had been working on, uh, to govern these this board, these are your own rules. And, uh, there are a couple of changes that are shown here as a result of our discussion from last month. I’ll just go over those. Uh, it looks like the changes are more significant than they really are, because some things moved around a little bit.

00:26:35,300	But basically the, uh, the meeting attendance interval of time was changed from, uh, seven regular meetings within one calendar year to seven regular meetings within a 12 month rolling 12 month period. So that would, uh, apply even if it’s going over December and January.

00:26:57,630	The other change is that the, uh, removal of members section really has been broadened to any, uh, breach of the bylaws could be subject for a recommendation from this board to the city Commission as it’s written to, to remove a member. So previously, it was really only for attendance. That’s the way it was written.

00:27:17,670	And I think Commissioner Shell had brought up the comment of of broadening that. Uh, so the attendance section was just moved into a different section, but the content is very similar, except for that interval change. Um, we also had some questions that I’ve sought some advice on from our city attorney.

00:27:36,170	So, uh, and the question is related to enforcement of the, of the bylaws. And I think, as we had mentioned in the meeting, but and I can elaborate a little bit, uh, the bylaws are really just the rules for your board. They are not legal laws. They’re really no different than a Rotary Club or a church board having bylaws that just govern internally yourself.

00:27:54,830	So enforcement would really be extended only to what the bylaws themselves showed, which is removal, which would be the most extreme case of enforcement. So, uh, that said, some of the sections of the bylaws do mirror actual laws.

00:28:20,430	Um, the conflict of interest section, uh, the language very much mirrors North Dakota Century Code 440422 uh, which is relating to conflict of interest of any elected or appointed uh, board member. And so the the question would be how would that be enforced? Uh, so the North Dakota Ethics Commission does not have jurisdiction over, over you, over this advisory board.

00:28:37,570	They would handle a state, um, complaint of a conflict of interest. Um, not one on this board. Uh, the city does have its own, um, uh, ethics commission as well. However, that only really pertains to employees, so that doesn’t apply here as well.

00:28:59,900	So really, the enforcement would be, first of all, from the bylaws perspective, removal, um, there could potentially be legal implications, uh, because it is a law that the conflict of interest, um, is so but that would have to be done through, through the courts, like, like any other laws. But there’s not really a body that’s, um, that’s set up to, to practice that enforcement.

00:29:18,030	Um, so that’s a, that’s a, an answer I’ve received to, to one of those questions, but I’m here for any other questions you may have or any other additions you’d like to make to the bylaws. Commissioners questions for Daniel. Mr. Shelton. , Daniel. Regarding the removal of members section.

00:29:36,970	It cites here that the Commission could recommend removal of any member of the Commission to the president of the Board of City Commissioners, subject to the authority, etc.. Um, would the ETA members need a different, I guess, mechanism that if and each a member of this commission was recommended for removal, it would go before the county commission for then potential removal? Can you maybe just explain what that

00:29:56,970	process would look like? And if there be an appetite to maybe incorporate a change to that section accordingly? Yes. Thank you, Commissioner, Chair and commissioners, I to start with the last part first. Yes, I think that there would be an appetite and I think that’s a good comment.

00:30:13,030	The, the way this is set up, because this board has pointed by multiple, um, other boards. The city commission appoints the city members, the county commission appoints the ETA representatives, uh, and each would only have authority over each.

00:30:30,700	So, uh, if a city commissioner were if city commission appointed seat were to be recommended for removal, that would go to the city commission. Uh, so as it’s written, it only mentions the city commission, but it, it probably should. And this is, I think, what you’re alluding to mentioned the county commission as well.

00:30:46,770	Um, if if there were to be a recommendation to remove a, an ETA member, that would be going to the county commission and they would make that final decision so we could make that amendment, if you wish. Okay. Thank you, Commissioner Shell commissioners, additional questions. I’m not seeing or hearing any Daniel with that, uh, I guess I would, uh, ask for a motion on this particular agenda item.

00:31:20,000	I would move to approve with the, you know, staff direction to make the modification to the removal of members section to add the ETA County Commission path for that, as appropriate. Thank you. Commissioner. Second. Second from Commissioner Swanson. Any discussion commissioners. All right. With that, sir, I ask you to call roll. Commissioner Johnson. Yes. Swanson. Yes. Schell. Yes. Sivak. Yes. Did we get Taylor back? Chair. Schwartz.

00:31:57,630	Yes. The motion is approved. With that, we’ll move on to other business this evening. And I believe, Daniel, you had some other business for us, correct or not? I think. So, okay. Fair enough. All right. With that being said, our next regular meeting is scheduled for July 22nd, 2026.

00:32:25,500	And with that, I will adjourn this evening’s meeting. And thank you all for your